Locher, M. (2004). Power and courtesy in action: discrepancies in oral communication. Berlin: Gruyter sheep. Sacks, H. (1973/1987). “On the preference for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation,” Talk and Social Organisation, eds G.B. Button, and J. R. E. Lee (Clevedon: Matters multilingues), 54-69. 1. Example for Agree Disagree Dialogue Conducted by 2 people This conversation is about birthday gifts, which are about topics of approval and non-approval.
Two people think it`s a good gift. In the example of the dialogue agreement, 2 people are very good at practicing role-playing, which makes it easier and easier to learn English. Although our corpus structure has been followed by the main features of multimedia corpus notation in general, in particular the DiAMSL framework (cf. In this way, we hoped for a better understanding and a more detailed description of the individual differences between spokespersons in the expression of functions as they are performed and interpreted by observers. The labeling of verbal and, in particular, non-verbal events for behavioral categories, was followed by an elaborate protocol in which annotators were continuously involved in discussions. The specificity of the differences between the subjects was recorded by a significant period of familiarity with the overall behavior of each of the subjects during ingestion, before the actual note could begin. The underlined expression expresses.. A. Sympathy B.
Possibility C. Disagreement D.